Log in

No account? Create an account
April 2007   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Posted on 2006.06.29 at 18:38


herocatholic at 2006-07-02 14:05 (UTC) (Link)
don't think that getting an abortion is killing because you're not killing a baby, and most times you're not even killing a fetus; you're killing a bunch of cells. I repeat myself: You can't kill something that has never lived.

So it really depends on when you perform the abortion on when you are or are not killing a fetus? Killing a fetus is not killing a bunch of cells anymore since a fetus has a heart and a brain and they are both work simotaneously in order to keep the fetus alive.

then you really shouldn't have scratched that itch a few minutes ago, and you REALLY shouldn't masturbate.

I laughed at that part. (however, the cells on my skin are already dead so it's okay to make that itch...masturbation on the other hand [despite the cells already being dead]...)

In addition, why does it always seem to be men that have a problem with abortions? Men don't understand what it's like to be female, what it's like to bleed and hurt every month, what it's like to be pregnant... To throw up every morning, to have something that's normally tiny stretch out to the size of a softball, to feel nothing but excrutiating pain.

What about women who are pro-life (and yes, I do know women who are pro-life)?

You say "Killing the baby or saving the baby?" When in all reality you're creating a child that will possibly have a life full of trauma, confusion, hunger, and even a life without truly feeling loved.

You are right, since I am not adopted [least I don't think so], I wouldn't know these feelings but that doesn't mean that saving a child so that they could find a suitable home and feel loved isn't worth it.

Plus, you can't play the "what if" game on this. What if...the child goes through trauma? But what if..the child finds a home and finally feels accepted and loved? Isn't that worth putting the baby up for adoption and saving the baby's life if one is pregnant?

As I tried to explain earlier: thousands of children are unwanted, unsupported, unloved. I don't think that any child deserves this, and abortion is a means of preventing it

I don't think they deserve it either, but I don't think killing them off is the answer.

You're pro-choice if you think that abortion should be allowed at any point in time, in any case.

But it's not ANY case. You are generalizing the word "risk" and then applying it to what I said, which you know is not what I meant. Yes, a woman being pregnant is itself a risk, but the risk isn't cited until the actual birth of the baby or a little bit sometime before it. Is the mother's life REALLY at risk if they are just pregnant? Not so much unless there are complications with the delivery.

About 46 million women get abortions every year. How many of those are in the risk of the mother's life? I would say not a whole lot since it's a rare occurance.

Lastly, abstinence doesn't work.

Last time I checked, it's the only full-proof 100% way of not getting pregnant. The pill works 99% and condoms work 95-99%.
never2muchmusic at 2006-07-02 20:02 (UTC) (Link)
I'm not going to try to explain myself again because you're obviously not open-minded enough to understand.
herocatholic at 2006-07-03 03:57 (UTC) (Link)
I understand what you are saying, I just don't agree with what you said.
Previous Entry  Next Entry